When launching the coup d'tat in Perak a couple of weeks ago, Najib and his sidekick, Zambri boldly declared:
"We are the legal government in Perak"
Meaning when you're legal, the other party is illegal.
What is really intriguing is that if the BN government under Zamri "the Zombi" Kadir is legal as claimed, their actions show otherwise. They acted as though Nizar's government is legal.
If they're illegal, why give a damn to what they do? After all they're illegal ma.
If they're illegal, why seek court injunction to stop the Assembly's sitting (today)? Their assembly sitting would be illegal also. After all it's convened by an illegal government ma.
If they're illegal, why lock up the state secretariat building? After all, an illegal government shouldn't use the building for illegal assembly ma. Any decision made by an illegal government is not binding ma.
If they're illegal, why run to London, crying to a Queen Counsel? After all, with or without the Queen Counsel's advice, they're illegal ma.
If they're illegal, why bother with the suspension of the MB and the 6 EXCO members? After all, the suspension is done by an illegal government is not binding ma.
If they're illegal, why must Abdullah "LAntong" Sabri care about Sivakumar's instruction? Just ignore him. After all, he's from the illegal government ma.
If they're illegal, why must Mohd Zahir Abdul Khalid served a notice of misconduct to Sivakumar, referring him to the Rights and Privileges Committee for his illegal action in suspending Zambri and the 6 Exco members? After all, he's from the illegal government ma.
Now, who's legal and who is illegal?
Only HRH The Sultan of Perak can help diffuse this confusion on who is legal and who is illegal. Nobody else can - not even the Court.
What is really intriguing is that if the BN government under Zamri "the Zombi" Kadir is legal as claimed, their actions show otherwise. They acted as though Nizar's government is legal.
If they're illegal, why give a damn to what they do? After all they're illegal ma.
If they're illegal, why seek court injunction to stop the Assembly's sitting (today)? Their assembly sitting would be illegal also. After all it's convened by an illegal government ma.
If they're illegal, why lock up the state secretariat building? After all, an illegal government shouldn't use the building for illegal assembly ma. Any decision made by an illegal government is not binding ma.
If they're illegal, why run to London, crying to a Queen Counsel? After all, with or without the Queen Counsel's advice, they're illegal ma.
If they're illegal, why bother with the suspension of the MB and the 6 EXCO members? After all, the suspension is done by an illegal government is not binding ma.
If they're illegal, why must Abdullah "LAntong" Sabri care about Sivakumar's instruction? Just ignore him. After all, he's from the illegal government ma.
If they're illegal, why must Mohd Zahir Abdul Khalid served a notice of misconduct to Sivakumar, referring him to the Rights and Privileges Committee for his illegal action in suspending Zambri and the 6 Exco members? After all, he's from the illegal government ma.
Now, who's legal and who is illegal?
Only HRH The Sultan of Perak can help diffuse this confusion on who is legal and who is illegal. Nobody else can - not even the Court.
1 comment:
Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!
Post a Comment